UN climate-change elites exposed in open abuse | American Vision News

UN climate-change elites exposed in open abuse | American Vision News


UN climate-change elites exposed in open abuse
by Joel McDurmon on Dec 21, 2011
A South African native and delegate to the UN climate change conference in Durban, Kelvin Kemm, was exasperated by the abuse and derision he and his colleagues received from UN officials, but the experience exposes just how corrupt the UN effort really is. He reports,

As we rounded a corner, we saw someone we didn’t know being interviewed for the in-house television information system that transmitted programs throughout the official venue. We were astounded by how biased and inaccurate his comments were. When atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose, temperature also rose, he insisted – very simple. Of course, that is simply not true.

His interview over, he stepped off the dais and headed our way. I asked him whether he would agree that global temperatures had actually gone down during the early 1970s, even as CO2 levels continued to rise. He refused to acknowledge this universally accepted fact. I then mentioned the Medieval Warm Period of a thousand years ago. In response, he asserted that the MWP was merely a localized event of no consequence. Also simply not true.

At that point Monckton asked him to acknowledge that the science was nowhere nearly as clear cut as he had proclaimed. The official refused to do so, asserted “I have work to do,” and walked off.

Josh had been filming the entire exchange, but now an aide put a hand over the camera lens. When I remarked that just walking off was bad manners, the aide said “You are not worth debating.” I replied, “All he had to do was answer two simple questions.” I was amazed when the aide responded, “He is the Secretary General of the World Meteorological Organisation. He does not have to answer your questions.” The aide then walked off just as rudely as his boss had.

Kemm’s colleagues were then booted—despite having been proper delegates and having filed all necessary permits, etc.—from the convention, and only reinstated after negotiation with UN officials.

But while they were readmitted, the elites’ attitude did not change:

A couple of days later, a TV interviewer asked IPCC Vice Chair Jean-Pascal vanYpersele whether there was now enough information to decide the next steps COP-17 should take. van Ypersele answered, “The body of knowledge was there already in the first [IPCC] report twenty years ago and was actually good enough to start the action which inspired the convention on climate change.”

The interviewer then asked if the science was well enough understood. “Not only is there enough science” the Vice Chair replied, “but that science has been there, available and explained by the IPCC, already from the first report.”

In other words, in the view of the IPCC, climate change science was settled even before the term “climate change” was coined – and all “research” and “findings,” reports and conferences since then have been window dressing – inconsequential. Even new evidence about cosmic ray effects on cloud cover, and thus on the amount of the sun’s heat reaching the earth, is irrelevant in the view of the IPCC and other UN agencies, and thus may be intentionally ignored.

This level of absolute arrogance, elitism, falsehood, and tyranny is perhaps believable, but is far beyond what most westerners expect of even the UN. Thankfully, journalists like Kemm and the Canada Free Press are exposing how bad the nonsense behind the media facade really is.