Retired Admiral Makes Stunning Benghazi-G ate Accusation
Inbox x
Inbox

9:47 AM (10 hours ago) ![]() | ![]() ![]() | |||
It's even worse that we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that BarackObama intentionally conspired with America's enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could "negotiate" the release of a "hostage" and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election? The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: "[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi... was the result of a bungled abduction attempt.... the first stage of an international prisoner exchange... [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the 'Blind Sheik'..." But something went horribly wrong with Obama's "October Surprise." Although the Obama Regime intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers...and the attackers, believing that the Obama Regime had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets. Make no mistake; Benghazi-Gate is the criminal enterprise that will bring the Obama Regime down, but that won't happen if Congress helps Barack Obama sweep this criminal conspiracy under the rug. We must demand answers... we must demand action... and we mustn't stop until Congress uncovers the truth and removes the Usurper-in-Chief from office. Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink. Make No Mistake: Lyons Is Only Scratching The Surface. MOREOVER, we firmly believe the problem with Admiral Lyons' assertion is that he is ONLY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE... the full and complete truth is much, much worse. Benghazi-gate is NOT about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. It's NOT about Obama Regime foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister... something potentially treasonous... and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter.
And treason is an impeachable offense. Congress has the power and constitutional authority to get to the bottom of this mess... and we're going to see to it that they do their constitutional duty. Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink. The Election Is Over And Congress Has Run Out Of Excuses For Delays. And prior to the election, Fox News' Geraldo Rivera pontificated that Republicans shouldn't"politicize" Benghazi-gate. Swaggering onto the set of Fox and Friends Rivera bloviated: "I think we have to stop this politicizing" and Rivera issued the following veiled warning to Republicans: "Do we want to try and influence the election with a tragedy that happened in North Africa?" Ironic, isn't it? Barack Obama played politics with the lives of Americans and Obama drones, like Rivera, in the media covered Obama's rear and threatened to accuse anyone and everyone who mentioned it of "playing politics." And weak-willed Republicans apparently took Rivera's threat to heart as Rivera also said thatRepublican Senators John Barrasso, James Inhofe and Bob Corker, who all sit on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee “all agree that the supercharged atmosphere around the story – prudence dictates that these hearings be postponed until" after the election. Well, the election has come and gone. Congress has no excuse. The American people needed the truth BEFORE the election... NOW... we're demanding it. Americans are dead. Are more lives in jeopardy? Did Barack Obama lie to cover up foreign policy ineptitude or did he lie to cover up something much worse? Is our own government actually conspiring with America's enemies? The American people deserve to have those questions answered and moreover the American people deserve justice. Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink. Floyd Brown The Center for Western Journalism42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086 (202) 370-6366 |
|
Regarding the claim that retired four star admiral James Lyons said that Obama conspired with enemies.
ReplyDeleteYou said: “The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
HOWEVER. It turns out that the Washington Examiner had no such article. It never even interviewed Admiral Lyons.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/search?search=admiral+lyons#.UPB24_KtmvA
There IS an article by Admiral Lyons in the Washington TIMES (perhaps you got the two mixed up). HOWEVER, while the article talks a lot about mistakes by the administration, it does NOT claim that Obama conspired with enemies to stage a mock attack that went horribly wrong—-or that he conspired with enemies at all. There is NO mention of conspiracy in the article. (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/28/lyonsobama-needs-come-clean-what-happened-benghazi/?page=all)
A blog known as The Examiner (which is not the Washington Examiner) did say that “Sources suggest the Benghazi attack was a bungled abduction attempt (Photos)”. And it quoted Admiral Lyons in a TV interview, but it did not say that Lyons said: ““[T]he attack on the
American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
Lyons did NOT say it, and the Blog “the Examiner” quotes its unknown
and untested sources saying that it MAY have happened, not that it did happen. (http://www.examiner.com/article/some-sources-suggest-the-benghazi-attack-was-a-bungled-abduction-attempt).
And yet birthers and the birther press believe such stories.
More than three weeks have passed, and there has been absolutely no confirmation that Admiral Lyons said: : "[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi... was the result of a bungled abduction attempt.... the first stage of an international prisoner exchange... [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the 'Blind Sheik'..."
ReplyDeleteNor has anyone else said it.
Considerably more than a month has passed and there has been absolutely no confirmation that Admiral Lyons said: " "[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi... was the result of a bungled abduction attempt.... the first stage of an international prisoner exchange... [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the 'Blind Sheik'..."
ReplyDeleteNor has anyone else said it.