Monday, November 26, 2012

U.S. electrical grid ‘inherently vulnerable’

U.S. electrical grid ‘inherently vulnerable’


WASHINGTON – With the world focused on the latest Middle East flareup and the increasing prospect for a wider military conflict there, a little-noticed U.S. report has sounded new alarms over the vulnerability of the U.S. electric power-grid system to terrorist attacks, which could cause even more damage than natural disasters, according to a report fromJoseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.
The effect, according to the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, would be blackouts over large regions of the country for weeks and even months, costing billions of dollars to repair.
The NRC report warned that the power grid is “inherently vulnerable” physically given the distances it covers, an already overly stressed bulk high-voltage system that can result in multiple failures. In addition, most of the major facilities remain unguarded.
A potential scandal surrounding this report is that it actually was written in 2007 but ordered classified in its entirety by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This means that DHS has known for at least five years of the various natural and manmade threats to the nation’s national grid system but has done virtually nothing to minimize potential damage.
The fact that it was released now strongly suggests that little has been done in the intervening years by DHS to mitigate the threats to the national grid system.
As WND/G2Bulletin recently reported, DHS has come under congressional fire for not giving EMP effects on the national grid system a high priority in disaster scenarios that would prompt action by DHS.
Failure to release the report for five years was briefly addressed in a forward to the report by Charles M. Vest, president of the National Academy of Engineering, who said that key findings of the report remain “highly relevant.”
“We regret the long delay in approving this report for public release,” Vest said.
“We understand the need to safeguard security information that may need to remain classified. But openness is also required to accelerate the progress with current technology and implementation of research and development of new technology to better protect the nation from terrorism and other threats.”
Release of this report comes on top of mounting concerns over the increasing prospects of intense natural and manmade electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, events that similarly could knock out large sections of the national grid system for months – and even years – potentially costing hundreds of billions of dollars affecting tens of millions of people.
Especially vulnerable to an EMP event and terrorist attacks are the high-voltage transformers. They are large, very difficult to move, are custom-built and take years to replace under normal circumstances. These transformers no longer are made in the United States.
Destruction of these transformers also can be done through terrorist cyber-attacks, either through Internet connections or by direct penetration at remote sites, since they rely on electronics, sensors and telecommunications which are linked to the outside and are not secure.
“Security of the U.S. electric power system is in urgent need of attention,” the report said.
“Power system disruptions experienced to date in the United States, be they from natural disasters or malfunctions, have had immense economic impacts,” said M. Granger Morgan of Carnegie Mellon University at Pittsburgh, who chaired the committee that wrote the report.
“Considering that a systematically designed and executed terrorist attack could cause disruptions even more widespread and of longer duration, it is no stretch of the imagination to think that such attacks could produce damage costing hundreds of billions of dollars,” he said.
Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.
Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.

Add New Comment

@SirJack74
  • Image
  • Share on:

    Twitter
Real-time updating is enabled(Pause)

Showing 6 comments

  • sebassh
    Yeah the electrical grid is as vulnerable as the electoral college grid. Both need fixing and are under the thumb of communists.
  • JustAnotherJoe10
    Getting rid of the Electoral College grid means that a potential, US president would only have to glean votes from about 15 states.  The rest of us would be out in the wind.  At least with the Electoral College, every state has a say in who the president is.  If that is ever eliminated, can low population states tell the Feds where to go, and keep the Federal income tax money for themselves?  After all, the other 35 states would be stuck with a president they had no say in voting for, and with no representation whatsoever.  As for the electrical grid, I am sure that the government has made sure to take care of themselves, and will leave the rest of the country in the wind if something major ever takes place.  For after all, when the grid goes down, people will be squawking to high hell for help, and will be more than willing to rid themselves of whatever is left of the Constitution to be taken care of.  Unfortunately, there is some method to the...
    show more
  • abrasmom
    This one has bothered me for years. The public didn't need a report from DHS, to know that this has been a weak link for a long time. But, it is even more urgent now, because it no longer would take a nation with a military to carry out a EMP on America. We would be totally unable to respond! We have heard for years that certain nations have unprotected nuclear weapons, and it would only take a small weapon of this nature to create havoc! Just as it was reported that Iran had a percentage of missing uranium when the IAEA toured their facilities. We've been told horror stories for years of how someone could enter with a suitcase weapon, or a weapon shot up from a ship near offshore waters. Yet, it seems as our govt. has no priorities to protect valuable assets. Yak, yak, yak, seems to be all they do.
  • So why isn't the private sector fixing this problem?  I mean, you don't want the government to fix it, because that would mean more government oversight.  You said that the private sector "built this" and therefore didn't need government, so why aren't private companies paying to make sure that they and the people who buy their products have electricity?
  • ImRight_UCanSayIt
     Michael, the private sector would like to protect their investment but they can't afford to do it because the Gov't has instituted authority over their businesses with the likes of the California Public Utility Commission... a body that won't let them charge what they need to in order to run a successful, modern business that can afford to protect its infrastructure. It takes months or even years to get rates hikes approved.
  • JamesPiekko1
     If 0bummer would loosen up on EPA and OSHA regulations, and would give them a tax break for daring to provide us with a much needed service, then they would be able to do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment