Harry Reid launches the Democratic war on Math
All who mocked Sharron Angle owe America an apology for foisting Malibu Stacy here on us
Harry Reid, the floor leader of the Democrats in the United States Senate, the most influential Democrat in the entire Congress, is innumerate. You see, he not only lacks an understanding of mathematics, apparently having no understanding of what kinds of sample sizes are needed to get an accurate sense of American public opinion, but he is also actively promoting his anti-math viewpoint against statistical, scientific polling.
Innumeracy is a real problem in America, said to be associated with problems like belief in pseudoscience, higher debt, problem gambling, and limited job prospects. Sadly, America is already suffering some of these consequences under the poor leadership of Harry Reid and his party. Since Harry Reid took over the Senate our debt has indeed skyrocketed, thanks in part to the failure of the Harry Reid Senate even to pass a budget at all, America’s job prospects have diminished, and the fad of global warming pseudoscience has continued unabated.
It’s easy to see why Clark County, Nevada wanted to return him to the Senate though, since innumeracy is what keeps the lights on there. I don’t understand why we must endure him as our Senate Majority Leader any more, though. Let’s take the Senate and knock him off in November.
Mathematics is at the heart of science. Millions of students of science all across America learn every day about how confidence intervals are a basic tool in understanding data. The typical Margin of Error cited for a poll is simply a particular way of stating the 95% confidence interval of the data gathered in the survey.
This is a subject from Chapter One of the government’s own Engineering Statistics Handbook, and a subject matter that any serious student of gambling should also know about. It’s shocking that a four-year Chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission would not understand the application and limits of variance to random results.
What’s interesting though is that Harry Reid didn’t used to be quite this innumerate. Even though now he claims that relatively small samples are inappropriate for measuring the opinions of “300 million people,” in the past he claimed that as few as 1200 people were enough to tell us popular opinion on SCHIP.
It would be unkind of me to suggest that Harry Reid’s sudden and vocal innumeracy was a dishonest effort motivated by political calculations, so I’ll instead float the idea that Reid suffers from late-onset Dyscalculia.
Nice Job Harry
trueconservative2012 Wednesday, March 14th at 3:39PM EDT (link)Yeah, but
BlueLandRed (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 8:57PM EDT (link)Innumeracy is hopefully something the Democrats will suffer from in Washington in January
Mike Ferguson (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 5:07PM EDT (link)Ronald Reagan
Well, Reid does have a point
Return to Revolution (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 5:22PM EDT (link)Man
Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 5:34PM EDT (link)Read the RedState Posting Rules
Intelligence without statistical knowledge is like a mouth without teeth
jakeofalltrades (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 8:11PM EDT (link)There you go again.
Flagstaff (Diary) Thursday, March 15th at 12:15AM EDT (link)Harry Reid's math seems good enough to put a lot of dollars in his own pocket
Next93 (Diary) Wednesday, March 14th at 10:13PM EDT (link)He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.
Define "poll"
livefreenh Thursday, March 15th at 5:50AM EDT (link)